Don’t make Dad pay

Well, women have Roe v. Wade, but what do men have when they don’t want kids?

Afterall, the poor bastards are forced to pay when a woman isn’t allowed to have an abortion and we all know that’s not fair. What is the law doing for them when those damned whores bring their children into the world without their permission?

ROE vs. WADEÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ FOR MEN ^TM

On March 9, 2006 The National Center For Men will file suit in a United States district court in Michigan on behalf of a man’s right to make reproductive choice, to decline fatherhood in the event of an unintended pregnancy. We will call our lawsuit Roe vs. Wade for Men. ^TM

More than three decades ago Roe vs. Wade gave women control of their reproductive lives but nothing in the law changed for men. Women can now have sexual intimacy without sacrificing reproductive choice. Women now have the freedom and security to enjoy lovemaking without the fear of forced procreation. Women now have control of their lives after an unplanned conception. But men are routinely forced to give up control, forced to be financially responsible for choices only women are permitted to make, forced to relinquish reproductive choice as the price of intimacy.

Not for long, freaks. You’re getting a little ahead of yourselves considering all the War on Women that is currently being fought. Of course, women do have many prevention options, like the pill. Perhaps they should be advocating a pill for men, hmm? I understand their adversion to the condom, because, well, it just doesn’t feel right. How unfair is that those whores would expect men to wear something so unnatural? Perhaps after birth control and abortions are no longer available, men won’t be so reluctant to protect themselves.

Our lawsuit will be filed on behalf of Matt Dubay, 25, a computer technician from Saginaw, Michigan. The state of Michigan is seeking to force Matt to pay child support for a child he never intended to bring into the world. Matt insists that the child’s mother repeatedly assured him she could not get pregnant and, also, Matt says that she knew he did not want to have a child with her. Matt is asking for the reproductive choice he would have had if he were “Mattilda.”

See how fucking stupid Matt is? Instead of making sure he was protected against STDs and unwanted fatherhood by taking matters into his own hands, he left it up to the woman. Now he’s kicking himself because he didn’t want that damned kid and has to pay. Hey, Matt! Should’ve worn that jimmy afterall, eh?

Here’s something that may shock men like our friend, Matt Dubay. Men do have reproductive choices.

1.)Like our bible thumping friends would say, keep it in your pants.
2.)Failing that, wear a condom. Too iffy for you?
3.)How about a vasectomy? Not only does it not require a scapel but it’s completely reversible. Considering how much money it would save you in child support payments, I’d say it’s well worth the cost.
4.) Don’t like the options I’ve stated above? How about being more selective about your choice of rutting partner? I’d say if you paid someone $20 a visit, she’s not likely to have a baby that you don’t want. It could get a little expensive in the long run, but it would save you money.
5.)Or you could just do a grandma, she’s too old to have damned kids, so you wouldn’t have to worry about any of that.

Look, guys, if you don’t want the babies that your little soldiers make then take it upon yourselves to prevent them. Otherwise, shut the fuck up and be a man. Keep in mind that you’re bible thumping cohorts are trying to make women’s reproductive choice obsolete, so you’re going to have to do it eventually. Why not start now? And that way you won’t have any damned rugrats sucking you dry and expecting you to be a ~~man~~ father.

(H/t Tennesee Guerilla Women)

Speaking of sex, you really need to go to World O’ Crap and see what she has to say. You may actually laugh.