Floating Boobies

Most of the people I follow on Twitter are progressive or liberal.  I like reading their various views on things and following their links. Mostly. Today a lot of them were pissing me off. I was in a foul mood anyway, so it didn’t take much to set me off. And I have no idea why I expected more from a group of people that laugh hysterically at Rush Limbaugh’s man-boobs (though he does so deserve to be laughed at for every single thing about him).

Carrie Prejean is Miss California. She’s the winner of a fucking beauty pageant that has made public statements against gay marriage. Whoo-di-fucking-do, right? There are enough intelligent women and men in this country to ably counter anything this chick might have to say. And generally she would be ignored anyway just because she’s a part of that “beauty pageant” subculture, which I can’t stand. I know I was ignoring her. And happily. There are thousands of people, who are more powerful and have more influence, that are against same-sex marriage and, I thought, those were the people the movement for same-sex marriage should be fighting against. Apparently, I missed the boat on how utterly important this woman is. Or, better yet, how shameful she because she 1) got breast implants and 2) she was photographed topless.

I have a lot of strong opinions on society valuing women’s bodies more than their intellect and talent. Who the fuck cares if you look good in a string bikini if you don’t know jack shit about what’s going on in the world around you? If you can’t manage your own finances, who the fuck cares if your nails are perfectly done? So, here’s a beauty contestant that has political views and has agreed to be a spokesperson for a group supporting those same views. That should be a relief to people who hate the beauty pageant culture for it’s objectification and dumbing down of the contestants. But no. Apparently she should have kept her mouth shut and just sat pretty.

This is where I’m parting ways with some of my lefty compatriots. Mock her for her beliefs, yes. We do that with everyone to a certain extent. Laugh at the stupid shit that may come out of her mouth1. But what’s the point of going on and on and on about her boobs?

She had a boob job before the competition. Ohmyfuckinggod! Can you believe that shit? Here’s a young woman who, for whatever fucked up reason, chose to enter a contest where she would be judged not on her intellect, talent or character, but on her looks, who paid money to improve those looks. According to societal standards, of course. The world of pageantry says that flawless skin, slim figures, and firm breasts are beautiful. Those that enter that world want to conform to those standards. Getting a boob job did that for this woman. It gave her an extra edge in that competition. That was the goal. Why is this shocking? Why isn’t the fact that she felt she needed a boob job being discussed instead of her fake “floating” titties? Why isn’t the fact that those new boobs probably won her more points than anything else in that competition being discussed?

I’ll ignore the chatter about her baring her breasts. I can actually see the hypocrisy in that as she’s supposed to me all moral and upstanding (and now I’m ignoring the question of why does women covering their breasts equal moral). She worked hard for that body and she wants to show it off, but she doesn’t want people that have lived together and loved each other for 50 years to be married. Yes, there’s hypocrisy there. That should most definitely be called out.

I won’t take Ms. Prejean seriously because she doesn’t take herself seriously and she’s a hypocrite. But it’s not because she had a boob job. If I dismissed every woman who’s ever done something to “improve” her looks I’d miss out on a lot of wonderful people, including:

  1. Any woman who has ever put on makeup because "her eyes are so much prettier that way"
  2. Any woman who has ever run on a treadmill in effort to fit into those jeans (as opposed to staying fit and healthy)
  3. Any woman who has "washed that gray right out of" her hair
  4. Any woman who has ever used wrinkle "reducing" cream
  5. Any woman who has ever worn control-top panty hose
  6. Any woman who has ever added spritz to her hair in order to "control the frizz"
  7. Any woman who has ever had her teeth straightened and/or whitened
  8. Any woman who has ever spent 5 minutes in a tanning bed (or laying out on the beach)

Of course, that’s only a partial list. As women, we are conditioned at a young age to do certain things to be pretty in our society. And most people don’t think ill of women doing that. In fact, if a woman in the public eye dares to go out without her hair done and makeup perfect she’s ridiculed. We do it because it’s expected of us. The only people who should be able to ridicule a woman’s physical "enhancements" are those that are perfectly happy with their physical appearance and don’t engage in any of the above actions2. Going on about a boob job is something I expect from asshole motherfuckers who can’t piece a coherent thought together to save their lives. You know the ones: "A woman’s place is in the home." I most certainly don’t expect to see it coming from people who are supposed to be more politically aware and sensitive.

The very nature of her anti same-sex marriage stance is repulsive. Argue that. But stop arguing that her argument is invalid because she got fucking implants. That kind of diminishment is insulting to all women. Progressives and liberals should be the last people to be using the way a woman looks to bury her argument—whether it’s good or no.

P.S.

I know these issues are regularly discussed on the rad fem sites. I was just irritated that this meme was going on for so long in my Twitter stream and even the self-professed feminists there weren’t calling it out. I’m glad, though, that since my temper tantrum it seems to have died down.

Popularity: 71% [?]

Sphere: Related Content

  1. I don’t listen to her as I was trying not to pay attention to her. []
  2. Including those not listed. []

Related posts:

  1. Dancing Naked or Something
  2. Crap
  3. Penis schmenis
  4. Win or no candy for you
  5. Caring for Your Uterus…for You
This entry was posted in Slap upside the head, Women's Issues and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

8 Comments

  1. CyberCelt (1 comments.)
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 9:17 pm | Permalink

    The whole entire world is going to hell. The polar bears and the wolves were delisted by Bush and that was sustained by Sec of Int. Ken “wimp” Salazar. I am so disgusted, I just want to SCREAM.

    I cannot even believe there are still beauty pageants. I know that they award scholarships, etc., but they also contribute to the reasons for anorexia, bulimia, big hair, big boobs and “my hope for world peace.” AUUUGGGGHHHHHH!

  2. Paula (5 comments.)
    Posted May 12, 2009 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Wot? Someone tried to look hawt for a beauty pageant? The nerve! All those girls probably have topless photos somewhere, so ridiculous. The sad thing is, she did speak for California — we DID vote in that awful Prop8. And Obama helped it pass with his weak mumble that no one listened to after he said he thought marriage should be one M/one F, which was grabbed out of context, widely quoted and disseminated via phone to all his black Christian supporters. It’s fine to blame the Mormon and Catholic money, but without the Obama voters, it would not have passed. Anyway, great post!

  3. Posted May 13, 2009 at 7:49 am | Permalink

    @Cybercelt
    I knew about the wolf. They wanted there to be 300 wolves across three states as a sign that they are bouncing back. When they were delisted there were upwards of 1000. I’ll check for a link.

    But you might be happy to know that I found out the polar bear hasn’t actually been delisted. They are “threatened”. Salazar has refused to allow the Endangered Species Act to be used to combat greenhouse gases. I’m pretty sure he doesn’t really give two fucks about them, but they’re still listed. Sarah Palin, though, is working hard to get them off the list. No doubt she’s hoping for a new pelt for her couch. Ugh.

    (Here’s a link for the Polar bear article I was referencing).
    (Here’s a link to a picture of an animal totally unrelated to the conversation.)
    @Paula
    Obama never publicly said he was for gay marriage. As a matter of fact, I bitched about that last year when I was saying how wonderful Dennis Kucinich was (who DID publicly state he supported gay marriage and not the bastard cousin of it– “civil unions”). However, without all that money from the Mormons and the “family first” crowd, those voters probably would never have given a second thought to that issue.

    Here’s the thing: In my community the Black folks are overwhelmingly against gay marriage– whether they voted for Obama or not. It’s hard for Black gays and lesbians to come out because of the backlash. Though eventually the family will come around, they experience a lot of harsh treatment from the community. It’s not acceptable, yet. Like it’s not acceptable in small Ohio towns. I don’t know about California, but I can pretty much bet that there’s similar sentiment there, or those people wouldn’t have voted the way they did.

    If Obama would have gotten on stage and said “Vote for gay marriage!” they still wouldn’t have done it. They’re not robots that will do his bidding no matter what. There is a culture there that had nothing to do with his message one way or the other. That culture has to be penetrated and overcome for the majority of Black folks to accept same-sex marriage. The money is what brought their attention to an issue on which they’d already decided.

    (Here’s a link to my post about my love for Kucinich and one wherein I grouch about Obama AND Clinton.)

  4. Posted May 13, 2009 at 7:52 am | Permalink

    Also, I hate fucking beauty pageants. HATE THEM. And I hate Donald Trump. They say we have no royalty in this country, but…

  5. Vince (122 comments.)
    Posted May 13, 2009 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Bascially 2 things:

    1. I too believe beauty pagents are totally stupid and that as a rule one should ignore ANYTHING said by anyone participating in one. Those are NOT the people we should be listening to and using as role models. Don’t even get me started on the kid pageant circuit.

    2. I heard her comments on gay marriage on the radio. She basically said, “No offense to everyone else’s beliefs, but this is what I believe”. Ok, fine. She’s entitled to her opinion. Agree or disagree and move on. Oh, and see point 1.

    Don’t people have better things to do than discuss some woman who’s goal in life is to be the best Barbie Doll in the nation/world?

    • Posted May 13, 2009 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

      I agree that there are better things to talk about. But I’m incredibly disappointed to see so much “OMG! BOOBIES!” from those on our side who are arguing against her own argument.

      So what she has fake boobs? Her grammar is atrocious and she’s selling herself to Donald Trump and the anti-marriage crowd. Isn’t that more important?

      Ok, maybe her bad grammar isn’t that important, but if someone is to be a spokesperson for any kind of organization I think they should know the basic rules of said grammar and I have no idea why I think America’s Best Barbie should be more literate than that…

      Anyway, I expect all of those ladies to be “enhanced” physically in some way and think their arguments are superficial and not worthy of noting. However, when I see supposedly feminist progressives commenting on the boobs I get a little hot.

      I thought you liked that about me. ;)

  6. Vince (122 comments.)
    Posted May 14, 2009 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    The being a feminist or the boobs? I’m good either way. However, I find discourse with you far more mentally invigorating than staring at your boobs. That’s invigorating in an entirely different way.

    • Posted May 14, 2009 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

      Getting hot as in “dammit! Now I’m pissed!” hot. LOL!

      I don’t think I’ve ever had a man tell me they liked me because of my boobs, even when they were just 18 years-old. Good thing, too, because my itty-bitties aren’t getting enhanced.

One Trackback

  1. By Sunday Links - May 24 | Superficial Gallery on May 24, 2009 at 11:24 am

    [...] Floating Boobies – I like when chicks say boobs – and JennyJinx says it like 47 times in this post.  I think it is about Miss California, but my eyes only read the word boobs.  And the other swears.  Jenny is a salty one! [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 437 access attempts in the last 7 days.