Ok, back to my previous entry. Firstly, let me explain something. I know almost nothing about HTML, but I’m trying to learn. I guess I haven’t learned enough to be able to use the HTML editor to post my journal (or edit it either). I’m still working on that. But for now…it’s rich text editor for me!!!
So, that guy was talking about using violence against the government to get his point across and he had some people that agreed with him. I think that they were probably actually considering joining up. I’m naturally suspicious. And I’m especially suspicious of someone talking so openly about such a high crime. Well, I told the board this. This guy got upset with me. And said some pretty stupid things to me. Stuff about me not knowing what I’m talking about, I guess. And that it was not illegal to talk about committing violence against the U.S. I guess he didn’t bother to look at my link, because he never mentioned that part of what I said.
It amazes me that people think they can say just anything anytime they want. Sure the First Amendment guarantees us the right to voice our dissent with the government, it does not however allow us to threaten our governing body. Congress has enacted laws against such a thing. And the Patriot Act takes that even further. I don’t know who this guy is, but I’m pretty sure he’s looking to cause trouble. Maybe get more convictions or something. I don’t know exactly. I know that if he’s just the regular guy he professes to be he should probably keep his violent intentions to himself. He’s just asking for trouble right about now. The government is just waiting for subversives to rise up so they can slap them down. I guess he’s the one who’s naive. I’ll give him that. Or he’s just completely untrustworthy.
Anyway, I left the thread and have no plans to ever respond to cry-baby anymore. I don’t trust him and would rather not put myself on the radar. I wish that I could challenge this guy more openly, but it’s not worth it. He’s one of those people that sort to personal attacks to further their own cause. They don’t like people coming in and interrupting their personal rants.
I’m like that, sure. But when I’m on a discussion board I expect (and sometimes encourage) others to challenge me. And there are plenty of people that would probably be suspicious of my motives. I don’t take any of their arguements to heart…unless they get personal. That’s when I just step away. I feel like it’s not my place to disrupt actual, good discussion with petty, personal bickering. This guy is not above that. I’ve noticed a lot of people are not above that. This guy could have emailed me privately and we could still be arguing back and forth. That’d be more appropriate. I probably should have just kept my comments to myself, but I don’t think a lot of people would have thought of the possibility that there was a mole if someone wouldn’t have said it. So I said it. If anything then there are some more people that are suspicious of this guy and are going to speak a little more carefully where he is present. And maybe his little game will come to an abrupt halt.
Of course, if he wants to catch someone for treasonous activities he’ll probably find lots to do on that particular board…lol. But when they start busting in doors I doubt that they find anything very interesting. Most of the people on the internet are just blowhards who have balls only when someone can’t see them.
Popularity: 19% [?]
Sphere: Related Content






Yahoo! News – WHO WANTS TO BE A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE MILLIONAIRE?
Yahoo! News – WHO WANTS TO BE A MEDICAL MALPRACTICE MILLIONAIRE?
This is a lovely article. I haven’t read a lot about “tort reform” in any of my online groups. Mostly just stuff about Iraq. I think that a lot of people are being brainwashed into thinking that this country is going to hell in a handbasket because people have the utter gall to sue doctors and corporations for their negligence. Of course, the Bush administration is pushing for this, because it saves his political donor millions of donors and takes away their responsiblity to respect the public good.
Imagine you’re in a car accident. Your leg is damages and you need it attended in a quick and efficient manner. The ambulance takes you to a nearby hospital where it’s determined that you need surgery. The doctor on call is someone who hasn’t slept in 72 hours and is jittery from too much caffeine. He messes up. You not only lose the affected leg, but because of the mistake you lose your other leg too. Who should be held responsible? You can no longer work to support your family, but the government has decided that the most your leg is worth is $250,00. Is that right?
Ok, this is an extreme example. What about the old lady who sued McDonald’s because she spilled coffee on herself (and had no idea it was hot coffee). Well, in my opinion the courts are fixing themselves when it comes to lawsuits like that. More and more judges are throwing these kind of suits out. That guy who was suing the fast food companies because he’s a fat ass didn’t make it very far. And that’s the way it should be. There’s nothing wrong with our system right now. Whenever someone really wants to sue for something stupid they can always go on “The People’s Court” and hash it out. Hell, that’s a good show. I love the way Judge Milan deals with stupid people (Judge Judy sucks, IMO). “But”, you say,” that’s a court of law!! You’re making my point.” The People’s Court is not a court of law. It’s arbritration. The parties sign an agreement that the decision is final, blah, blah, blah, and they won’t take the case back to real court.
Anyway, most lawsuits don’t even make it to court. The really good ones are settled. It’s only when the defendant has some kind of arrogance that their wrongs will be overlooked or the plaintiff is just greedy that these kind of things make it before a jury. And then, well, someone’s going to get screwed. Fix the jury system. Fix the judicial system. I don’t think there’s really a need, but leave the awards part alone if something really must be done.
“But,”you say,”medical insurance is through the roof. We’ve got to do something!” The AMA has already stated that tort reform is not likely to affect insurance premiums. And really the insurance companies are going to raise their prices over anything. They are out to make money. They are going to make money. Tort reform is only going to make their losses a little less. The insurance companies are now getting too big and too powerful. I think that something should be done about them
Popularity: 26% [?]
Sphere: Related Content