**Note: I have a small Fibro fog issue today, so please excuse any typos as I don’t feel like waiting to write this.**
Wanna hear read a funny? Remember when they were trying to decide if I had cancer1? Well, last week I got a letter from my insurance company. It reads, in part:
We are in receipt of a claim for the above referenced patient. In order to determine if a pre-existing exclusion applies to these services, we require additional information.
[...]Date Span: 11/07/2008-5/07/2009
1. Did the patient have medical coverage for the date span above?
YES ____ NO ____
2. If yes, please submit evidence of coverage (a certificate of prior coverage from the prior insurance carrier or a letter from the prior carrier with dates and types of coverage held.)
3. If no, please complete the attached questionnaire.[Stuff that's unimportant to this post.]
When I got the letter, I called the insurance company to see what I should check. I had insurance until March 20, 2009. Since I was only uncovered for a little over a month I wasn’t sure how to proceed. I was told to check option #1 and fill out the questionnaire. Crap. I didn’t know what claim was being potentially denied nor could I remember all of my doctor’s appointments. I knew, since this was the period where my marital status was up in the air, that I hadn’t seen my rheumy, but what about the others?
So, I called all my doctors. You’d think they’d want me to pay them for the dates of service, but they were pretty understanding. I had only been to the doctor for my ganglion cyst (did I even mention that on my blog?). I couldn’t get a hold of my Gyn until today and guess what? Hadn’t been there during that time period either!! Woo-hoo! Take that, coverage denying fuckers.
Of course, they’ll probably deny it anyway. Even though I didn’t go without coverage for a full 63 days, this particular insurance company is so sucky they’ve reportedly told one patient they hoped they didn’t die when they denied cancer treatments for that patient2. Meh.
Popularity: 2% [?]
Sphere: Related Content






Firebaggers
Firebaggers1 can fuck off.
What’s a “firebagger”, you ask? It was originally coined by someone at Daily Kos ( in reference to FireDogLake’s new love affair with Grover Norquist and the teabaggers2. Of course, Jane Hamsher lost her fucking mind and thought “Well, shit, if they oppose all things Obama and I oppose all things Obama then we’re peas in a pod!” And that’s how the two names became forever entwined.
Now, a few months later, the termed as become to mean something a little broader. Instead of just referring to those on FDL (who love to hate all things Obama) it’s defining other Progressives who would as soon join with the teabaggers as stand against them. These folks decry the term “teabagger” as offensive and insist that they be referred to as “Tea Party Activists”. They see no reason to stand against them and think progressives should reach out and bring them into our fold. They say things like “They’re just like us– except uninformed!” Suddenly instead of being what they’ve proven themselves to be– against Obama at all costs, birthers, racists, cry-babies, anti-union, anti-Progressive and general idiots– the teabaggers are “populists” just like liberals.
Huh-wha?
I was listening to Thom Hartmann’s radio program today and I just couldn’t take it anymore. He was spouting this bullshit about the teabaggers3 being on the same side of us and how they’re just regular folks who don’t know and blah blah blah. The more he yammered, the more irritated I became. I was, for a while, a fan. I haven’t listened in a couple of weeks because I had other things to do. I wasn’t prepared for the teabagger lovefest. And he became just another firebagger to me.
Teabaggers are anti-union. They believe that unions are the bane of the American business. They don’t believe that workers should have the right to organize. They think that auto-workers make too much money and don’t do enough work. They’re happy for the corporations that send their manufacturing overseas (and get tax credits for it).
Teabaggers don’t believe in global warming or environmental protections. They believe global warming is a hoax perpetuated by unions and liberals to further their “anti-business” agenda. They believe that environmental laws inhibit business and cost too much money. They think that Wal-Mart should be able to put a store any damned where they please. They see nothing wrong with logging the rain forest.
Teabaggers are against any kind of regulations on businesses. They think that the banks should be further deregulated, as should the insurance companies. They blame programs for the poor for the financial meltdown. They think the solution to the nation’s health care woes is to completely deregulate the insurance companies– which is their solution to all other problems regarding industry.
Teabaggers want to privatize social security4 and do away with most other social programs. Those damned poor people are just leeches, welfare queens and free loaders. Make them all get jobs, but don’t give them minimum wage because that’s too hurtful to businesses.
Where do the teabaggers and Progressives agree? Where? Well, firebaggers join with them when they’re busy opposing specific Obama policy– which is pretty much every Obama policy. Firebaggers have decided that since the teabaggers seem so organized then they must be on the side of good– or would be if they were just “informed”. Bullshit.
Teabaggers aren’t uninformed. If anything, they’re willfully ignorant. They were happy with government waste when a Republican was running it, but as soon as that black Democrat with the funny name was elected they decided they were pissed. Mostly they were pissed because that guy won, but they found so many other reasons to be suddenly overwrought with anger at government spending. Especially the spending that would help other people (social programs and/or HCR).
Teabaggers deny Obama’s very citizenship. They ask for “proof” of his birth– even after seeing that proof. They applaud those brave citizens who legally challenge Obama’s legitimacy. They doubt his parents’ marriage was legal. They call him “the Anti-Christ”, “Manchurian Candidate” and “affirmative action candidate”.
Firebaggers are just pissed because Obama hasn’t invited them into the Whitehouse and/or isn’t the Great Liberal Savior they thought he was going to be (depending on the firebagger doing the bitching). Anyone who doesn’t declare Obama a sellout or Rahm puppet is declared a sellout, Obama-worshipper5 and/or paid shill for [insert name of evil government lobby]. They say that we shouldn’t call them “teabaggers” because they’ve got good intentions and ignore the signs that teabaggers carry to their rallies (Obama as a witch doctor anyone?). And since teabaggers are against the same person they are against, they ally themselves with them. They’ve even taken to airing attack ads and doing negative polling against Obama.
Disgusting and pitiful. I believe that the majority of firebaggers are just PUMAs remade. I firmly believe that they would have opposed Obama no matter what stance he would have taken on anything. And I believe their leader(s) is(are) using them in the same way that the teabagger leaders are using the teabaggers. They want power and prestige and donations and are willing to tear down anyone that gets in their way. They are using the anger and disillusionment of some Dems6 to their financial advantage. I mean, they didn’t write “Crashing the Gates”, so they had to get on the teevee somehow. Right?
Popularity: 7% [?]
Sphere: Related Content